The ADR process primarily addresses which type of disputes?

The answer identifies that the ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) process primarily deals with disputes arising from governing documents. This is correct because ADR is designed to provide a more efficient, informal, and cost-effective means of resolving disputes without resorting to formal litigation. Governing documents, which include items such as bylaws, declarations, and CC&Rs (Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions), typically encompass the rules and guidelines that dictate how a community association operates and how its members interact. When disputes arise concerning these governing documents, ADR methods like mediation or arbitration are often utilized to resolve these issues amicably, as they involve interpretations and enforcement of the specific rules set forth within these documents.

While violations of NRS (Nevada Revised Statutes) and violations of NAC (Nevada Administrative Code) can also lead to disputes, they often require different legal proceedings or regulatory remedies, and are not always suited to the ADR process. Thus, the focus of the ADR process is most closely aligned with issues that stem from the governing documents of community associations.