If the Ombudsman's intervention fails, what is the next possible course of action?

In situations where the Ombudsman's intervention does not resolve a conflict or issue, the appropriate next step can vary depending on the context and specific circumstances surrounding the case. It's important to recognize that both referral to compliance and referral to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) are legitimate and viable options, and the decision on which path to take should be guided by the nature of the problem at hand.

Referring to compliance usually indicates that there may have been a breach of rules, regulations, or standards that require enforcement actions. This route is essential to ensure that any violations are addressed through formal channels and that the community adheres to established guidelines.

On the other hand, ADR offers a more collaborative and often less confrontational approach to resolving disputes. This method can involve mediation, where an impartial third party helps facilitate a resolution between the conflicting parties.

Since the appropriate action can depend on the unique facets of each situation, including the severity of the issue, the relationship dynamics between the involved parties, and the desired outcomes, the correct response of either referral to compliance or ADR—as a subsequent step after the Ombudsman's efforts—recognizes the flexibility needed in community management practices. This adaptive approach facilitates effective conflict resolution strategies in a community setting, ensuring that all available resources